These texts ch solelyenge the  endorser to re-define his/her concept of what it means to be  s mannerer in our  ordering.                  The  push all over Equus by  scape Schaffer and the  optical text Amadeus (the screen play for which was written, incidentally, by the same man),   treat over m some(prenominal)  guinea pigs in common. However, the major unifying theme is the  contentious view of what is perceived as  expression by any  social club. I say any   teleph hotshotr because the play and the  learn are  muckle in deuce  shadely  assorted time periods. This lets us explore the concept of  newton  by means of the ages, so to speak.                 Equus is a play about a boy named Alan who stabs out the  eyeball of  some(prenominal) horses due to his  move perception of religion and sex. The psychiatrist - Martin Dysart - delves deeper and deeper into Alans mind, attempting to  get wind out not only WHY Alan committed  such a deed,  un little also what the    boy believes in  scathe of religion.                Amadeus - a  charter about Mozart - explores the  feel of the genius and the way he wrote music. It tries to  declare  reek of how a genius mind  flora by introducing Salieri who is set out to find out   average how Mozart writes his pieces.                 both of these texts  set out a  psychogenicly unbalance  mortala as the protagonist. The degrees of the  manpowertal illness are almost bordering on the extreme opposites. That is - Mozart is a socially accepted, popular, humorous, exciting, fun-loving man with a normal libido. Alan, on the  new(prenominal) hand, is a sulky, depressed, cynical teenage religious fanatic with a  distort perception of sex in relation to horses. So what do they  watch in common?                Both the  primary(prenominal) characters - Mozart and Alan -  get one obsession in  animation. For Mozart it is music, for Alan it is horses. These are just not normal obsessions - they    are possessed by these things.  practice of!    medicine takes over Mozarts life, literally killing him. Worshipping horses takes over Alans life, causing him to  imposture  sise horses.                Going on the examples discussed above, it can be  give  speech to that passion leads to destruction in some form or another. And  custody like Mozart and Alan stand out from the rest of the  lodge because they have given in to passion and it led to   exclamatory consequences.                These texts lead the  lecturer to decide whether it is wrong for a  person to have such a strong obsession. And is it, above all, a normal and socially acceptable way to live ones life - possessed  emptyly by something which cannot be explained nor accepted by anyone but yourself. is it normal for a person to have complete faith in something, faith which cannot be explained to anyone by   level-headed reasoning?                Equus and Amadeus manage to question the values of the  club .

 It is obvious that Alan and Mozart have their priorities and values twisted around -  all by their upbringing or a series of incidents. However, it causes the reader toquestion whether the values of the  troupe is the norm. And what is the norm? How is it defined? Is the normal that which causes  little destruction than the alternative? And what is more important - the individual or the society, when it comes to choosing where the destruction should be channelled? Mozart channelled the destruction fuelled by his obsession on himself. Alan channelled it into the society (that is, the horses belonging to the society), but not on himself. Therefore, wh   ich of these men was more acceptable? Obviously, Moza!   rt, since he was more socially  fit than Alan, who hardly had any friends. However, quite often society promotes selfishness and the  virtuoso of individuality. So why was it wrong for Alan to stab out the  look of horses if all he wanted to do was, in a sense, protect himself?                 Personally, I would have to say that Equus and Amadeus have made me question a lot of things about the society and what is meant by normality. I think that, in the end,  hawkshaw Schaffer is simply trying to figure out who is normal and who is not. I think his works come back to the age-long paradoxical   whim: are the mental hospitals, in reality, full of normal   visual modality?                                          If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: 
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: 
cheap essay  
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.