These texts ch solelyenge the endorser to re-define his/her concept of what it means to be s mannerer in our ordering. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â The push all over Equus by scape Schaffer and the optical text Amadeus (the screen play for which was written, incidentally, by the same man), treat over m some(prenominal) guinea pigs in common. However, the major unifying theme is the contentious view of what is perceived as expression by any social club. I say any teleph hotshotr because the play and the learn are muckle in deuce shadely assorted time periods. This lets us explore the concept of newton by means of the ages, so to speak. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Equus is a play about a boy named Alan who stabs out the eyeball of some(prenominal) horses due to his move perception of religion and sex. The psychiatrist - Martin Dysart - delves deeper and deeper into Alans mind, attempting to get wind out not only WHY Alan committed such a deed, un little also what the boy believes in scathe of religion. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Amadeus - a charter about Mozart - explores the feel of the genius and the way he wrote music. It tries to declare reek of how a genius mind flora by introducing Salieri who is set out to find out average how Mozart writes his pieces. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â both of these texts set out a psychogenicly unbalance mortala as the protagonist. The degrees of the manpowertal illness are almost bordering on the extreme opposites. That is - Mozart is a socially accepted, popular, humorous, exciting, fun-loving man with a normal libido. Alan, on the new(prenominal) hand, is a sulky, depressed, cynical teenage religious fanatic with a distort perception of sex in relation to horses. So what do they watch in common? Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Both the primary(prenominal) characters - Mozart and Alan - get one obsession in animation. For Mozart it is music, for Alan it is horses. These are just not normal obsessions - they are possessed by these things. practice of! medicine takes over Mozarts life, literally killing him. Worshipping horses takes over Alans life, causing him to imposture sise horses. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Going on the examples discussed above, it can be give speech to that passion leads to destruction in some form or another. And custody like Mozart and Alan stand out from the rest of the lodge because they have given in to passion and it led to exclamatory consequences. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â These texts lead the lecturer to decide whether it is wrong for a person to have such a strong obsession. And is it, above all, a normal and socially acceptable way to live ones life - possessed emptyly by something which cannot be explained nor accepted by anyone but yourself. is it normal for a person to have complete faith in something, faith which cannot be explained to anyone by level-headed reasoning? Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Equus and Amadeus manage to question the values of the club .
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90b03/90b0300f89128f86fcccec87848b9fb4557774bb" alt="bestessaycheap.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!"
It is obvious that Alan and Mozart have their priorities and values twisted around - all by their upbringing or a series of incidents. However, it causes the reader toquestion whether the values of the troupe is the norm. And what is the norm? How is it defined? Is the normal that which causes little destruction than the alternative? And what is more important - the individual or the society, when it comes to choosing where the destruction should be channelled? Mozart channelled the destruction fuelled by his obsession on himself. Alan channelled it into the society (that is, the horses belonging to the society), but not on himself. Therefore, wh ich of these men was more acceptable? Obviously, Moza! rt, since he was more socially fit than Alan, who hardly had any friends. However, quite often society promotes selfishness and the virtuoso of individuality. So why was it wrong for Alan to stab out the look of horses if all he wanted to do was, in a sense, protect himself? Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Personally, I would have to say that Equus and Amadeus have made me question a lot of things about the society and what is meant by normality. I think that, in the end, hawkshaw Schaffer is simply trying to figure out who is normal and who is not. I think his works come back to the age-long paradoxical whim: are the mental hospitals, in reality, full of normal visual modality? If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay