What Is The Nature Of United States Hegemony?`

The Two-Fold Nature of the unite States HegemonyAfter the Cold War , the joined States emerged as the solo world power with the economic and soldiery qualification to back it up . Hence , the transnational system is more often than not influenced by the decisions of this hegemon . However , we could see that even though the united States remains the strongest state in the world , it cannot wide of the marky approve out its impertinent policies unilaterally . It needs the cooperation of other states in the first place it can successfully complete its goals . and so , the couplight-emitting diode States whitethorn be the only superpower , that its hegemony can live against it in a unipolar international system . The reputation of the United State s hegemony is two-fold - it is not only the superpower because of its military might , merely because of its widespread nicety and economic forward motion as wellDavid Capie analyzed the dealing of the United States with three southeast nations - the Filipinos , Malaysia and Indonesia . All three countries uttered their support against act of terrorist act , save their stances fluctuated and were heavily influenced with home(prenominal) interests . These states did not join together to subvert the aggressive tendencies and comfort fittingness the power of the United States , but they as well did not jump into the bandwagon except for the Philippines , and even then the Philippine semipolitical science expressed limits on to what extent it was provideing to help oneself . Also , the three states changed their positions after the aggressive action of the United States of attacking Afghanistan , and then waging war on Iraq . Whereas Indonesia started as halfhearted in its support for the United States war on terrorism , after the attac ks on Afghanistan it started to express crit! icism against the use of force out and became firm on its criticism when the Iraq war came .

Similarly Malaysia strongly supported the United States war on terrorism , but when the US started flexing its military muscle Malaysia changed its tone and used the show of violence as a leverage to round up local terrorist elements and to criticize US actions at the same cartridge clip clip preserving the regime s political stability in the agricultural . In the case of the Philippines , its support faltered when the US released prematurely that it will be sending troops in the country without the Philippine government s sign , rousing do mestic opposition that led to recanting the teaching and maintaining the forces will only be for training . It shows that the US has overestimated their walking(prenominal) ally s dedication , that it too needs to be sense of balance domestic interests with foreign goalsThe instability of the governments in the Southeast and the fondness of social breakdown in their societies is a great touch on of their leaders . The Malaysian , Indonesian , and Philippine governments all place nation-building , or at least , maintaining the peace in their respective(prenominal) regions and consequently securing their regime s continuing legitimacy . The United States should be able to take these states domestic concerns in drafting foreign policies and in courting allies The positions that states take are influenced by both(prenominal) international and domestic factors , and...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.c om

If you want to get a full essay, visi! t our page: cheap essay